This Thriller Sequel <em>Influencers</em> Could Give Competing Streaming Thrillers Serious FOMO
“The entire situation smells like a bad TV movie,” remarks an opportunistic commentator midway through the horror sequel Influencers. At that point, his tone is manipulatively dismissive toward an interviewee whose bizarre tale he once said he trusted. Yet his description of what’s happening on screen isn't inaccurate. Superficially, a pair of films on demand chronicling a young woman who worms her way into the lives of online influencers and then murders them feels like a modern-day version of a lurid yet network-approved weekly TV movie. The wild thing about Influencers remains how much better it is compared to much of its competition, regardless of where you watch it. It is precisely the thriller that should give other movies a serious bout of FOMO.
Recapping the Original and Establishing the Scene
2022’s Influencer follows the mysterious CW (Cassandra Naud) as she methodically selects traveling alone influencer targets, entices them to their deaths, and covers up those deaths (for a time) by seizing control of their online accounts. The movie concludes (spoiler ahead) with CW marooned on an uninhabited island near the coast of Thailand, after her latest target, Madison (Emily Tennant), turns the tables on her.
This provides the 2025 Influencers a degree of ambiguity, as returning writer-director Kurtis David Harder picks up with CW happily living alongside her partner Diane (Lisa Delamar) in Paris. On a journey to celebrate the couple’s one-year anniversary, British influencer Charlotte (Georgina Campbell) draws CW's attention and anger.
CW comments to Diane that a person should try leaving a phone-addicted influencer in a place with no technology to see whether they can survive. Is this an origin-story prequel? Did CW become extremist after witnessing the preferential treatment afforded one fame-seeker?
Evolving Viewpoints and Global Pursuits
The story’s perspective shifts several more times, eventually clarifying those introductory moments' place in the timeline. The story revisits Madison, now exonerated for carrying out CW's offenses, yet still encounters suspicion over her recounting of the events, which includes the killing of Madison’s boyfriend. We also follow Jacob (Jonathan Whitesell), living in Bali attempting to juice his career as half of a right-wing-influencer duo alongside Ariana (Veronica Long), though his preferred medium involves masculine-focused livestreams, rather than the Instagram photos that typically capture CW’s attention.
The actor continues to be immensely captivating in her role, which seems especially tailor-made for her talents. (She even created CW's eye-catching wardrobe.) While the follow-up's screentime balance tips heavily toward CW — the first film seemed more balanced between her and Madison — it still works as a story of rival investigators, as Madison and CW employ fake accounts, social media surveillance, and an apparently unlimited travel budget to chase or evade each other. Then again, maybe the unlimited budget aren't needed. Online personalities possess a knack for getting to explore posh places at little cost, a skill that CW echoes through her more blatant scheming.
Ingenious Filmmaking and Cinematic Travelogue
The filmmakers behind Influencers seem similarly resourceful about finding stunning locations to visit, though they were presumably less nefarious about it. The vast majority of the film appears to be shot on location, giving it a real-world weight that remains even as numerous sequences involve a handful of actors of people staring at computer or phone screens.
It follows the same logic that made the Bond franchise appear so consistently opulent over the years: Indeed, explosive action and special effects can display large spending, but simply offering a kind of visual tour for the audience also seems deeply filmic. This is especially fitting for a narrative so dependent on the coexisting superficial glamour and try-hard grind of creating jealousy-worthy digital content.
All of the characters visiting Bali, like those staying in Thailand in the first film, appear to enjoy entry to unbelievably stylish modern bungalows; films exist concerning beach rescuers which don't feature this much overhead swimming-pool footage. The characters have to convincingly occupy these lush, far-flung locations to highlight the uneasy irony of how often each person — including the woman exacting revenge upon the online stars' narcissistic falseness — nevertheless devotes much time in the glow of their devices.
Balanced Depictions and Digital-Age Suspense
Simultaneously, the director has not crafted a rant targeting the emptiness of online fame. Though it is gratifying to see CW exploit different internet celebrities, and a sense reminiscent of Hitchcock of alignment allows us to wish she evades capture, the filmmaker is somewhat sympathetic to the major influencer characters. Previously, he keyed into the loneliness Madison felt during ostensibly dream getaways. Here, the director appears confident that just observing Jacob in action will reveal that he’s peddling snake-oil masculinity to other gullible men; he resists turning into a caricature the character. He even grants Jacob a measure of dignity by showing his genuine loyalty to his girlfriend; he is two-faced, but Ariana is a partner in his double standards, not someone exploited by it.
The flip side of Harder’s even-keeled presentation means it may occasionally seem as if he’s nodding at bits of contemporary digital culture without deeply exploring them further. This is particularly evident of the way he introduces artificial intelligence into the plot, an intriguing development that lacks the psychosexual kick it deserves. The retitled sequel of Influencers could offer fans of the first movie hope for an Aliens-style escalation, and the movie ultimately delivers exactly that, with an appropriately wild final act. However, initially, it resembles more a polished Hitchcock thriller than a wild-eyed, technology-obsessed De Palma-style shocker. Influencers’ heavy use of real-world locations may also be what prevents it from seeming like pure nightmare fuel. Our society might be saturated with content-churning influencers, digital deception, and exploitative travel, but the world itself is still here, at least for now.